Impact evaluation
We offer a range of services that evaluate the impact of programmes. We cover a wide spectrum of our partner’s needs, from statistical approaches (randomised control trials, quasi-experimental designs) through to theory-based approaches that focus more on understanding how impact occurs and who benefits. Wherever possible we use mixed-method approaches to provide a holistic understanding of impact.
Use the filters below to explore our work in impact evaluation.
Filter content:
Ideas to Impact – Adaptation at Scale: Final Evaluation Report
The Adaptation at Scale (A@S) Prize sought to promote innovative approaches to scaling up and out climate change adaptation...
Evaluation of the 2016 – 2021 Unified Budget, Results and Accountability Framework (UBRAF)
The establishment of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) in 1996 represented a key step in a broader...
Eyes on a prize for climate information services
The UK Aid-funded Ideas to Impact programme, which is managed by an IMC Worldwide-led consortium, has just launched our...
Until no-one is left behind: Strengthening CSOs’ role in immunisation
Global immunisation coverage is advancing towards the 90% target set by the Global Vaccine Action Plan.
Ideas to Impact – The Dreampipe Challenge: Final Evaluation Report
The Dreampipe Challenge was a competition that aimed to increase funding of activities designed to reduce non-revenue water...
Adolescents 360 Evaluation Process Evaluation Methodology: Updated
This report details our Adolescents 360 Process Evaluation methodology, including the evaluation questions, workstreams,...
Lessons from an ex-post evaluation – and why we should do more of them
Even as evaluation specialists, rarely do we get the chance to carry out ex-post evaluations. We recently carried out an...
Final Evaluation of DFID’s FoodTrade East and Southern Africa Programme
With the conclusion of Itad’s five-year longitudinal evaluation of the UK Department for International Development (DFID)...
Learning Note: Does Market Development work in Nepal?
Following the completion of an evaluation of Samarth-NMDP1 for the UK Department for International Development (DFID), the...
International Health Regulations (IHR) Strengthening Project, Global Public Health Division, Public Health England – Third party monitoring and evaluation agent
Itad is supporting the IHR Project alongside Public Health England, to generate the intended outcomes and impact as the...
Executive Summary: Evaluation of Humanitarian Innovation and Evidence Programme: Summative Phase Two
The Department for International Development (DFID) invested £54.6 million into a humanitarian innovation and evidence...
A360 MTR Spotlight 1: Lessons from evaluating A360
This brief draws out lessons from the A360 Mid-Term Review, on evaluating a program developed through human-centred design.
A360 MTR Spotlight 2: The A360 experience of Human Centered Design
Adolescents 360 (A360) is a four-year, $30 million initiative (2016 – 2020) to increase adolescent girls’ access to and...
A360 MTR Spotlight 3: Meaningful Youth Engagement
This brief draws out lessons from the Mid-Term Review on the role of youth engagement in A360. Despite attempts to standardize...
A360 MTR Spotlight 4: Service providers – the battle to serve
This brief draws out lessons from the Mid-Term Review on the challenges service providers face in delivering quality...
A360 Evaluation Mid-Term Review Summary
This is a visual summary of the Midterm Review of the Adolescents 360 Program, which draws together insights from an ongoing...
